
Picture courtesy of Robert Brook
So we got all these cameras and elecronic devices like traffic ligts requireing energy being installed. This constantly increases the carbon offset requirments of the UK and drains energy sources. I have a problem with this from an environmental point of view. Just how much carbon is required to power a camera? Is this extra carbon footprint on the UK justifiable?
This opens up whole new ball games. For instance, the countless numbers of pedestrian lights and traffic lights that are constantly being installed. And seemingly in unnecessary locations, certanly in Kent UK. Not only does this grind traffic to a halt and spend tax payers money on frivolous short-sighted traffic schemes, but the carbon footprint of the installation and the continued energy burden is not being factored.
We could turn off every other street lamp. We could turn off traffic lights in the night between certain hours when they aren’t needed; both from a traffic flow point of view and energy saving. Common sense schemes helping motorists and saving energy at the same time.
Street lamps and traffic lights should be self sustaining with solar panels and could add energy to the national grid. We already have the infrastructure for an instant solar power farm that is actually the whole of the UKs streetlamp infrastructure. No need for special planning permission for new masts or objections from a visual point of view. The posts are already there. We should be making use of the real estate and making sure they contribute towards the energy requirements of the UK: solar panels, wind or water turbines that could contribute energy to the UKs energy infrastructure.
Picture courtesy of Robert Brook



Recent Comments